Why Right Now Is a Crucial Time for Islam in Europe

January 8, 2015 - accent chair

The clarity of comprehensive fear during a terrible tragedy that took place in Paris has not nonetheless abated. The concern of what happened — an dispute on a foundations of a thought and use of a giveaway press — is unprecedented. France grieves and so should all right-thinking people who value democracy and tellurian rights. We empathize with a families who have suffered such comfortless loss.

The boss of France, Francois Hollande and his domestic opposition and former president, Nicolas Sarkozy, appeared together in a expose of togetherness to reject what had happened in a strongest words. They steadily reflected a defiance, annoy and startle that a republic felt. World leaders from President Obama to a primary apportion of a U.K. rallied around in a expose of oneness with France, vowing to mount by it.

Both Hollande and Sarkozy expel a attacks in Paris in terms of a Huntingtonian topic of a strife of civilizations between a West and Islam. Hollande cursed a “exceptional barbarism” and Sarkozy announced this to be a “barbaric” dispute on civilization itself. It was “a fight on civilization,” pronounced Sarkozy. Implicit in such statements was Huntington’s thought of a clash.

“It was now a matter of life and genocide to know a European Muslims. . . a doubt on people’s minds was how to modify Jihadi John to Malleable Mustafa and Jihad Jane to Loyal Leila.”

It was precisely to demeanour during what is function in Europe in a context of Islam that I, along with my investigate team, conducted fieldwork opposite Europe, that resolved this week. We were in France a fortnight ago.

During fieldwork for a investigate plan called “Journey into Europe,” we visited about 50 towns and cities and 50 mosques, interviewed over 30 imams, opposite a length and extent of Europe. We talked to students and professors, cab drivers and shopkeepers, presidents and primary ministers, archbishops and arch rabbis.

The aptitude — indeed coercion — of a plan to investigate a Muslims of Europe was underlined as we trafficked final summer. Geopolitical developments in a Middle East — and elsewhere — were joining European Muslims directly to universe events. The media were stating that several thousand European Muslims were concerned with a battles distracted in Syria and Iraq. Of these, a British supervision claimed some 400 were from Britain.

In mid-August, when James Foley, a American journalist, was brutally beheaded by a male who spoke with a British accent and wore a mask, a media frenzy to expose his temperament was a concentration of a news. American atmosphere strikes began and there was speak of larger troops impasse in a Middle East. In some senses, it seemed that it was déjà vu. But this was a almost altered conditions with new players. The museum of dispute was no longer Afghanistan, and a Taliban were no longer a protagonists. The media were now articulate of European Muslims being a threat, a Trojan horse. The media discussed “Jihadi John” as they had progressing talked of “Jihad Jane.”

It was now a matter of life and genocide to know a European Muslims. From a primary apportion of Britain down to typical journalists, a doubt on people’s minds was how to modify Jihadi John to Malleable Mustafa and Jihad Jane to Loyal Leila.

The problem was that this doubt could not be answered though some believe of a Muslim village — a clarification of a possess identity, a care patterns, a eremite and domestic players, a purpose of a imams, a position of mothers and women in a family in conversion a immature men, and family with supervision and a broader public. While few people had a answers, these were precisely a questions that indispensable to be addressed.

That is given a investigate insincere a larger topicality than had been dictated when it was designed. It is an benefaction investigate of a Muslim village in Europe in a context of a impact on a world. Because a investigate is shaped on fieldwork conducted in a community, it is as authentic as possible, and given it aims to benefaction a holistic design of a Muslim village via a continent, it is means to juxtapose a whole operation and farrago of Muslims, from Edinburgh in a north of Great Britain down south to Melilla, a Spanish possession in North Africa, from Cordoba in a west to Xanthi in a easterly in Greece nearby a limit with Turkey.

Muslims tumble into 3 extended categories in a context of Europe today: they are inland or internal (like a infancy of Bosnians); immigrants (many of them come to a nation that colonized their land so feel they have a right to be there as a fact of chronological respect — North Africans, generally Algerians, to France, South Asians to Britain; nonetheless exceptions embody Germany as it invited “guest workers” generally from Turkey a nation that it did not colonize); and translates (especially a immature seeking answers to their devout problems).

I advise we inspect these opposite categories of Muslims in Europe in 3 graphic phases of a history: Muslims have been in Europe given 711, that can be taken as a start of a initial proviso of a Muslim participation in Europe. It was a time in certain places and for certain durations of what a Spanish call La Convivencia — The Co-Existence . This proviso finished in 1492 with a tumble of Granada, the final eccentric Muslim kingdom, and a contingent exclusion of Muslims (and Jews) from a Iberian Peninsula.

The second proviso of Muslims in Europe starts around a 15th century and lasts until a 20th century and is shaped by a clashes between European Christian army and Ottoman armies. Ideas of Islam as visitor and rapacious are staid in European minds as a outcome of this phase.

The third proviso starts when European countries inhabit Muslim lands in a 19th and 20th centuries and immigrants arrive in Europe to work and find improved lives from a second half of a 20th century onwards. A second and third era of Muslims is now entrance of age in Europe. There are many issues around these generations that emanate debate, controversy, annoy and even loathing in a infancy population. Issues of “terror”(such as a attacks in Paris), Sharia and a hijab are broadly compared with Islam in a renouned imagination.

Here are some rough conclusions:

  1. What happened in France was intolerable and tragic, though not wholly surprising. While we were in a nation there were during slightest 3 incidents of Muslims committing acts of violence. Most Muslims live in ghetto-like and bankrupt “rough” areas. There were whole areas in Marseille, a city in that about 30 percent of a race is Muslim, that seemed to be “no-go” areas. Gangs involving Muslims sole drugs freely. Violence therefore emanating from communities like this is not surprising.
  2. The attribute between Muslims and non-Muslims opposite Europe also feeds into a clarity of Muslims feeling underneath encircle today. Over 17,000 Germans marched in Dresden opposite Islam and three mosques were pounded in fast period in Sweden. Muslims were being decorated as “non-Europeans” and “barbarians” who had no place in a “civilized” Europe.
  3. Muslims via a continent were impressed by a clarity of uncertainty. While there was a poignant opposite pull — for example, a historic perfume Cathedral darkened a lights opposite a protests in Dresden — it did small to ease a clarity of anxiety.
  4. We remarkable a definite double failure: Muslim care and organizations have dramatically unsuccessful given murderers such as those in Paris are entrance out of a Muslim community. Without strengthening a Muslim care and community, these comfortless incidents will continue. For example, there is no executive mosque in Marseille. There is so no focal indicate for amicable classification and action. Muslim leaders should be underlining a fact that a village lives in a opposite amicable and informative context from a ones that they creatively inhabited in Algeria or Pakistan; that Muslims everywhere would be unfortunate with viewed insults to their faith and their soothsayer though that a approach to criticism is not by violence.
  5. Local European administrations have also failed. Otherwise, such attacks would not be function with such frequency. Effective strategies need to be worked out in tighten coordination with a Muslim village in sequence to check assault in a future. Violence will not be tranquil unless both Muslim and non-Muslim leaders work together. The clarity we had was of rambling initiatives in one place and a extreme use of force in another.
  6. We mostly forget in a United States how tighten Europe is to Africa and Asia. The continents indeed meet; both in a west, with Spain and Morocco, and in a easterly with Turkey and Greece. This means that borders are “porous.” Some 150,000 immigrants landed in Italy in 2014. Some 1,300 were rescued from a sea while we were on a island. As prolonged as there is domestic disharmony in North and Central Africa and a Middle East, people will rush their homes to find preserve abroad and Europe will sojourn a destination. A long-term process to bargain with refugees needs to be worked out as shortly as probable or internal resources will be impressed really soon.
  7. Considering a several incidents function during a same time opposite Europe, it is not formidable to interpretation that a emanate of Muslims in Europe will poise a outrageous plea to society, including a doubt of law and order, in a entrance time. Dealing with it is a matter of tip priority.
  8. The boss of France and a imam of a categorical mosque in Paris both righteously cursed a murderers, observant they would go to hell, etc. The problem is a arrogance that these actions are religiously motivated. Muslims might have been regulating eremite rhetoric, though these attacks are a effect of a sociological sourroundings of their lives in Europe today. Therefore, a response needs to be to forestall effectively such incidents in a destiny rather than removing concerned in fatuous theological discussions. Besides, a plan and process to bargain with a minority village needs to be set in an all European context.
  9. It is a uneasy time in Europe, and it will need wisdom, bravery and care in both Muslim and non-Muslim leaders. Fortunately, there are group and women of unusual prophesy who we were absolved to accommodate — from Bent Melchior, a former arch rabbi of Denmark, to Rowan Williams, a former archbishop of Canterbury, to Mustafa Ceric, a former grand mufti of Bosnia-Herzegovina. In their messages of interfaith and intercultural cooperation, dialogue, and understanding, they reflected a Jewish idea of tikkun ulam — to reanimate a fractured world. We should mind them.

Professor Akbar Ahmed is a Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies during American University, Washington D.C., and was a former High Commissioner from Pakistan to a U.K. and Ireland. His latest book and film plan is Journey into Europe: Islam, Immigration and Empire.

Watch a video next for some-more on his investigate in Marseille.

source ⦿ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/akbar-ahmed/paris-attack-europe-islam_b_6439418.html

More chair ...

› tags: accent chair /