The Story Behind The Time Steven Spielberg Wanted Haley Joel Osment For His Animated ‘Harry Potter’ Movie

April 12, 2016 - accent chair


Getty Image

The universe altered on June 26, 1997, a day that J.K. Rowling published Harry Potter and a Sorcerer’s Stone in a UK. Wizards, witches and a anticipation they inhabited would go on to enthuse 6 some-more books, seven films, theme parks, a play in London’s West End and a spin-off book and film adaptation that will some-more than expected furnish an wholly new series. Today’s parents, many of whom grew adult reading the Harry Potter books as kids, are flitting on Rowling’s words to their children, a routine that will doubtlessly lead to a new era of fans. In a way, they and other Potter fans have actor Haley Joel Osment‘s outspoken antipathy for a cinema to thank. If The Sixth Sense star had been picked for a suggested purpose instead of newcomer Daniel Radcliffe, a informative impact of Rowling’s novels would have looked most different.

After Rowling sole a rights to Warner Bros. in 1998 for a healthy volume of money, a studio began scouring a ranks of famous Hollywood talent. This done sense, as a plan as large as Harry Potter was certain to attract a lot of courtesy (and box bureau returns), so executives preferred experience. Hence, one of a initial names to enter care for a director’s chair was Steven Spielberg.

Yet as Alan Horn, current Walt Disney Studios authority and former Warner Bros. boss and COO, told the Los Angeles Times in 2010, Spielberg and Harry Potter weren’t meant for any other. Why? Because a director’s ideas for a instrumentation weren’t acceptable to what a studio had in mind:

“I did consider it would be inestimable for Steven Spielberg to direct,” Horn said. “We offering it to him. But one of a notions of Dreamworks’ and Steven’s was, ‘Let’s mix a integrate of a books, let’s make it animated,’ and that was since of a [visual effects and] Pixar had demonstrated that charcterised cinema could be intensely successful. Because of a necromancy involved, they were really effects-laden. So we don’t censure them. But we did not wish to mix a film and we wanted it to be live action.”

What’s more, Rowling — who’d been given full entrance to a studio’s doing of her egghead skill — had prerequisites that didn’t filigree good with Spielberg. When asked about a probable pressures Hollywood was exerting on her in a 2000 interview, a author scoffed during a idea:

“At a moment, in all honesty, they don’t. Maybe they did in a commencement though afterwards they saw a recognition of a books as they are. At a impulse they are giving me a outrageous volume of influence. It will be filmed in Britain, with an all-British cast.”

source ⦿

More chair ...

  • Bridge of Spies: EW reviewBridge of Spies: EW review When Steven Spielberg rolls up his sleeves and digs into the past to make a serious historical film like Amistad or Lincoln, loaded adjectives like “old-fashioned,” “patriotic,” and […]
  • The Chronicle panned it: “Caddyshack”The Chronicle panned it: “Caddyshack” “The Little Man is doing what?” (Photo: Warner Bros. Pictures) I could 100 percent see someone in 2015 saying that they don’t like “Caddyshack.” The most likely scenario is […]
  • Daniel Radcliffe Doesn’t Get Your Harry Potter ReferencesDaniel Radcliffe Doesn’t Get Your Harry Potter References Daniel Radcliffe stars in Horns, now in theaters. Evan Agostini—Invision/AP The star of Horns, in theaters now, talks snakes, snacks and Satan Horror, humor and romance […]

› tags: accent chair /